where strange brilliant ideas for the future intermingle and breed…

Home > Articles > Unarmed Combat in Zero G

Unarmed Combat in Zero G

Posted: Sun, April 07, 2013 | By: Dirk Bruere

As far as I know, nobody so far has actually experimentally investigated martial arts in a weightless environment, other than under water. This article concerns constraints and opportunities presented by unarmed combat in zero-G environments without a spacesuit being involved. If one includes a spacesuit, then we are in a situation analogous to knights in armor, where the only realistic option is a weapon, probably a reactionless pistol based on the Gyrojet. What is not an option are the “space axes” of the 1940s SF writer E. E. “Doc” Smith!

While some insights can be gained by practicing in a swimming pool, many crucial features of true freefall are missing, most notably the lack of resistance to movement and the importance of bodily inertia. Apart from the space station, the only other place where this could be practiced is in an aircraft flying a parabolic trajectory – the so-called “Vomit Comet”, which can provide up to thirty seconds of weightlessness.


There are two unique problems one encounters that separates this from the gravity-bound situation with which a martial artist normally deals. First, there is no “down” and no gravity to assist in applying locks. In fact, most “groundwork” will no longer be of relevance. The second is that without gravity and a ground with which to push against, Newton’s Third Law (action and reaction are equal and opposite) makes itself very obvious. You hit someone with a straight punch, and both of you fly apart. Fight over!

So, bearing this in mind, what will work and what will not? I intend to examine the classes of techniques common to many systems, but for information I have practiced and taught Shorinji Kempo for more than thirty years, so there may be a certain bias, even though it is a fairly comprehensive art. If I have missed something interesting, or you feel I have got something wrong, please comment below. Anyway, let’s start with the basics…

Kicks and Punches - Strikes

The major problem as mentioned is that as soon as you hit someone with a straight punch, you both head off in opposite directions. The problem is even worse with kicks, because as the leg is raised and extended rapidly, you will move backwards and in a circle, probably enough to put you just out of range. We see this with beginners even on Earth. If their balance is not forward, they get thrust backwards.

On the other hand, if the strike is a hook or roundhouse, the person throwing it will start to rotate, and on impact both parties will begin to spin.

The obvious solution is to hold the opponent while the strike is delivered. Additionally, because the opponent must now be closer, fists and feet give way to knees and elbows. Aspects of an art like Thai Boxing could come into its own.


A lot of the combat effectiveness of a throw, especially in something like Judo, comes from having your opponent hit the floor in a gravity-assisted manner, quite often with you dropping on top of them. Clearly this type will not work at all. There is no getting your opponent “off balance”, because in zero gravity, everyone is off balance all the time!

An alternative is the type used in Shorinji Kempo and Aikido, for example Kote Nage. Here the wrist is bent at ninety degrees and twisted outwards. The resulting pressure on the wrist, elbow, and shoulder forces opponents to spin and fall. They typically do this in one of two ways. If they are beginners, they will fall outwards onto their back. The more advanced student will execute a forward somersault in the air. Again, neither of these forms will work in zero-G as described.


The trick is to use the combat forms of such techniques, which is something most outsiders never see executed. What most people see and practice is the art, where the person executing the throw does it so smoothly, allowing the opponent to flip or fall without damage. The really nasty versions are the ones we must use in weightlessness. This is where the twist is executed using a rapid jerking motion designed to injure the wrist, elbow, or shoulder. The opponents’ inertia stops them spinning because it is over so quickly, and the hand is returned to its original position.


Locks are used to immobilize and control and opponent. However, any lock that requires the opponent to be on the floor as part of the technique in order to prevent an escape… well, you should be able to guess the answer by now. Ditto any technique that requires body weight to make it work.

We need locks that will work in any orientation and where leverage is not gravity-assisted. A couple are shown below. The first is the “Back Hammer” that most people know. In weightlessness the person applying it probably needs to be pressed up against the opponent’s back.

The second is a rather spectacular picture of a Judo Arm Bar. Normally this is executed with both parties lying flat on the ground. However, it is effective in any orientation, provided those executing it lock their legs together over the opponent’s body.

As anyone who watches MMA knows, a lot of the fights end with this technique. Another favorite is the strangle or choke. In fact, this may work far better in low-gravity environments, because many ways of escaping from it rely on using weight for leverage, which will no longer be available.


Strangles are incredibly effective. If they are properly applied, a person has less than five seconds to escape before unconsciousness ensues. Finally, this leads on to a series of techniques that become even more important in our new environment…


Pressure Points

Shorinji Kempo teaches 142 such points, which are defined as points that will inflict unconsciousness, immobility, or extreme pain without the application of great force. Depending on type, they can be struck lightly, for example the eyes; or finger pressure can be applied, for example the inside of the collar bone. A full discussion is beyond the scope of this article, but they are disproportionately effective in grappling situations, which is almost a perfect description of zero-G combat. One must also remember the effectiveness of very basic forms of attack, such as head butts and simply biting a chunk out of someone!


For the martial artist the weightless environment provides a unique opportunity to extend millennia-old knowledge. It is probably too dangerous for those aboard the ISS (International Space Station) to engage in much of what is described above, although it would be welcome, especially if properly documented. In the meantime, we might hope that someone with an interest in these arts gets to fly the Vomit Comet, take some videos and stills, and report back on the experience. They will be making history.


What about blood? Also got to keep in mind the blood spatter that results from some of these blows. If you have blood particles floating about while you’re fighting, you’re then putting the two in risk of said blood hitting your eyes, maybe even entering your mouth.

These would, of course, be rare occasions, but probable occasions nonetheless. It wouldn’t necessarily prevent a Zero G fight from occurring, but it would most definitely add on the risks involved when participating in one.

By B.J. Murphy on Apr 07, 2013 at 11:35am

That’s a good point and is an extension of the problem of free floating fluids in a weightless environment. However, I would expect there to be less blood than in a normal fight simply because delivering an impact sufficient to break the skin (or anything else) is much harder than on Earth.

By Dirk Bruere on Apr 07, 2013 at 12:07pm

I wish to know why you believe something like E.E Doc Smith’s “Space Axes” would not be an option, while admittedly the current way we would use and axe or similar weapon currently would not be all that effective in zero gravity, several small adjustments in weapon form and use would make them vastly more useful, Possibly more effective in zero gravity and micro gravity than in normal gravity. from what You’ve written I seem to get that you’re assuming a zero gravity fight to be stationary, however I don’t think a real zero gravity fight would be any more stationary than a real Full gravity fight is, in fact i would suspect there to be far more moving involved, simply because of the extra possibilities for avoiding each other in directions. If a fight were to take place where neither person could touch a surface to give stability of propulsion then yes it would be a very stationary fight, however the moment the first blow is struck then both parties would rapidly begin to move. with any form of bladed weapon the act of moving is all that’s needed to cause damage if it has a sufficiently sharp edge, however as the person above me pointed out, the risk of blood is extremely high…

By Bryan Burling-Claridge on Apr 07, 2013 at 3:43pm

You are correct that in an enclosed space the fight might be very dynamic with people bouncing of all surfaces. However, in order to do someone significant damage and actually bring the fight to a conclusion grappling would probably be needed. *Unless* a weapon were used. I think the problem with an axe of any significant mass would be that the person using it would rotate as they tried to swing it. A knife, OTOH, would probably be far deadlier since its preferential mode of use would be stabbing.

By Dirk Bruere on Apr 07, 2013 at 4:56pm

I wonder how effective weapons like thin chains or pieces of rope or such like will be to ensnare an opponent. Especially if the opponent is wielding a knife and you want to immobilize his/hers arms and legs.
Well, maybe we will see one day.

By Dutchcon on Apr 08, 2013 at 8:31am

Not that Smith’s books are realistic in any way (though they are a lot of fun!), but he actually addressed that consideration. Most of the time when they were using the axes, they were in artificial gravity; when they weren’t, there were techniques such as anchoring oneself to something so as to generate angular momentum for the swing. The whole point of the axes, though, was that they had personal shields that blocked projectiles (which concept predates Dune, by the way!) - otherwise, they’d just have used guns like any sensible person.

Geek? Who’s a geek? grin

By Aaron Sher on Apr 09, 2013 at 5:17am

Leave a Comment:

Note We practice Buddhist Right Speech in our communication. All comments must be polite, friendly, and on topic.

What color is a white cat?